For defenses of the scene and character, Alyssa Rosenberg of the Washington Post and Sam Adams of Indiewire are particularly astute.īut much of what's driving fans' anger isn't really about Natasha. To a lot of people it seems as if she, like so many female characters, is being reduced to her reproductive choices.įor more on why many find this scene troublesome, check out Meredith Woerner and Katharine Trendacosta's excellent io9 post (which also wonderfully explains why it's silly to call Natasha's brief capture by the film's villain a damsel in distress moment), as well as a piece by Jen Yamato at the Daily Beast. To a lot of people, it seems as if Natasha, like so many female characters, is being reduced to her reproductive choicesīut in the context of this scene, and specifically in the context of her relationship with Bruce (which culminates in the two of them discussing running away together), it's much easier to infer that Natasha is so sad about not being able to have kids that she thinks of herself as a monster. She's never seemed particularly interested in starting a family, and her story is about seeking redemption, not about having kids. In the context of Natasha's overall character arc - she's a deadly assassin trying to atone for the awful (mysterious) things she's done - it's hard to argue that Natasha thinks she's a monster specifically because she can't bear children. You still think you’re the only monster on the team?* It makes everything easier - even killing. One less thing to worry about, the one thing that might matter more than a mission. It's the way Natasha relays this information that has caused many to question the way Ultron treats the character - and whether the film is ultimately uninterested in the emotional lives of women. Having a child might compromise her ability to kill people with impunity, her trainers believed. Natasha, impassioned, tells him all about her training as a master assassin and reveals her deepest secret: she was sterilized. Bruce demurs, referring to the (quite literal) monster inside him. Natasha (who is played by Scarlett Johansson) has a bit of a crush on Bruce (Mark Ruffalo), and she's trying to convince him they would make a great couple. The scene in question involves Natasha Romanoff, better known as Black Widow, who is played by Scarlett Johansson. They're hiding out from the apocalyptic doom raining down around them and their fellow Avengers - the perfect opportunity to have a chat about their incipient relationship. Natasha Romanoff (Black Widow) and Bruce Banner (the Hulk) are taking a breather at a farmhouse owned by a friend. The controversy focuses on a scene partway through Avengers: Age of Ultron. But is this controversy his fault, or part of a larger problem with Marvel's inability to know what to do with its one successful woman superhero? And his decision to quit Twitter in the aftermath of Ultron's release (in what was largely a quirk of timing) has only fanned the flames. Whedon has been a geek hero for years now, but a few of his directorial choices in Avengers: Age of Ultron have caused many to accuse him of misogyny and call for his head. There are many, many more collected in this Storify. Redkicks May 3, ur movie is shit and you should feel bad. No one wanted a retread of buffy/angel set to 'splosions. I'm so glad won't be around to fuck up avengers anymore. Look at these angry tweets sent to the director and screenwriter Joss Whedon, the man behind both Avengers movies, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and a host of other beloved geek OINK OINK YOU MISOGYNIST PIG
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |